•
u/Varderal 3d ago
That'll take the desperate crimes off the table. The ones fueled by greed will always be presant no matter how utopian we all live.
•
u/Smrtihara 3d ago
It says lessen, not eliminate. Everyone knows crime would happen anyway, just far, far less of it.
→ More replies (70)•
u/Albaholly 3d ago
It also prevents desperate people from falling into line with greedy people.
→ More replies (7)•
u/WanderingRonin7 3d ago
How do you fix that though? Genuine and sincere question. I yearn for a better world to live in where we as a species and planet are able to survive, but thrive, without endangering others in the process. It always takes just a few to ruin things for everyone else. How do you take that mindset and change it in a more forward and positive direction. If there was one trait I could take away from humanity, it would be greed, but there is no black and white answer. Something like that would take generations. My favorite quote is, "A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in".
•
u/Maxathron 3d ago
robust internal affairs and extreme punishment.
They just gotta purely be working on investigating crimes and not making up decisions to get people whom you don’t like or agree with.
Which, is hard because everyone sees this and immediately jumps to “how can I use it against my enemies only?”
→ More replies (24)•
u/BobWiley6969 3d ago
You do the things in the post. Or are you talking about fixing greedy people?
→ More replies (2)•
u/T_______T 3d ago
I mean Ruby Franke wasn't motivated by greed to torture her children. Keep in mind there are many, many reasons crime happens.
→ More replies (3)•
u/Professional_Size_62 3d ago
studies have shown that the severity of punishment actually has very little effect on crime occurance rates - what does have a large effect is the expectation of being caught.
from what i can see, we have a passive society with lenient legal systems these days. feels like every day you hear of some violent attack from a 32 times convicted felon that was released without bail like the week before. What's more is that poor or anti-social behaviour is tolerated, things like playing loud music on a train for example.
a layer close to the core, people feel like they're the only person that matters, they are the main character - in contrast, in japan, it is normal for people who arrive to work early, to park the furthest from the building, assuming that someone running late will need to park close to the building. They care about their community, they participate in it and they self regulate their collective behaviour. We do not.
we need better policing both from police but also from citizens. people should hesitate to make a scene in public or to do something anti-social. Reddits like r/ImTheMainCharacter should be starved of content.
→ More replies (10)•
u/Bob1358292637 2d ago
It would be easier for me to believe our issue with crime is more about strictness than allocation if we weren't still locking people up over weed and shrooms. I feel like we waste so many resources punishing people for minor stuff that often has zero negative impact on anyone when we could be using those resources to police gang bangers and actually violent offenders instead.
→ More replies (76)•
u/No_Pumpkin2628 3d ago
Personally, I think the only way is something that would catch a reddit ban for typing out.
•
u/DopyWantsAPeanut 3d ago
That underplays the importance of social trust. People who believe they can "win", if they follow the rules, trust the system. People who have no trust or hope in the system fear only punishment, and that is only so much of a deterrent.
→ More replies (4)•
u/Sweaty_Landscape_119 3d ago
Also, when people see there are non repercussions for their crimes, will continue to commit crime.
For example laws that allow people to commit crimes and be back on the street in hours. Why?→ More replies (15)•
u/GargantuanCake 3d ago
Yeah this is one of the things that people never seem to think about.
Some people are just dicks. It's reasonable to make the "let's reduce crimes of desperation" argument but there's always a certain percentage of the population that just chooses to steal, rape, and murder. It's thankfully a small percentage but it's always there.
You can reduce crime by getting rid of crimes of desperation but it never eliminates it. Same with the "but we'll add social workers!" argument. Some people are just irredeemable monsters and there isn't anything you can do about it.
•
•
u/OrangeSpartan 3d ago
No shit, no one is claiming it stops crime. It lessens crime. You think a treatment is only worth doing if it's a cure?
→ More replies (14)•
u/Ok_University_6738 3d ago
The OP mentioned universal healthcare. That should include mental healthcare. The vast majority of people who are “just dicks” aren’t born that way. People turn to violence because violence was used against them. Abusive or negligent upbringing is the main thing that causes that. With universal healthcare and better social conditions FAR fewer people will commit assault or murder or rape because their underlying mental issues will be addressed.
Narcissists, sociopaths, and psychopaths will still exist but with proper treatment far fewer of them would act maliciously. The biggest common thread among serial killers and pedophiles is they were abused at a young age. If we had proper healthcare in place for long enough then the abusive parents of those people would have their issues addressed before it would turn those kids into monsters in their adulthood.
→ More replies (14)→ More replies (85)•
u/Bubba_Gump_Shrimp 3d ago
But you realize that the reduction would be SIGNIFICANT? It's not just 'crimes of desparation' that are born of poverty. It is gang culture. It is systemic single parenthood. It is children growing up running the streets learning to do bad shit. If people actually had financial stability all of these things would improve. There is a reason why most economists project an ROI of 4x when govts invest in social welfare systems. Hell I'm a shining example. Grew up on medicaid and EBT cards, single parent addicted to opiods. Now I own my own home, a vacation property, and a brand new vehicle. I make over $150k and have paid more in taxes than I ever consumed on govt assistance. When you help lift people out of poverty, you gain back productive members of society that contribute to their communities and the GDP. It should be the ultimate goal of government, improving the quality of life for it's citizens. Not starting wars in the middle east, locking up minorities, starting trade wars, and protecting pedo billionaires.
→ More replies (18)•
u/Yop_BombNA 3d ago
That by definition of what you just said lessons crime…
No one said you stop crime, that’s impossible, some people are just shitty, a lot of criminals though are just desperate, not all but a lot of
→ More replies (4)•
u/Hammerofsuperiority 3d ago
No, but you see, if it only fixes 99.99% of the problem, it's trash and we shouldn't implement it, because it's either perfection or nothing.
As they say "Perfect is the enemy of good".
•
u/Jalapenoplanter 3d ago
When people talk about “crime” they are almost never talking about white collar, fueled by greed, crimes
•
→ More replies (216)•
u/SilverWear5467 3d ago
That depends. If we improve society to the point that a business owner who does everything he can to underpay his employees is treated like scum by his family and friends, rather than treated normally, crimes of greed will go way down. It's about what is socially acceptable to the people around you. And if we can create an expectation that people behave kindly towards the rest of society, those who violate it will naturally end up doing it less.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/EnvironmentalGift257 3d ago
You can reduce crime by reducing poverty. You’ll never eliminate either. Authoritarians believe that they can eliminate crime by increasing suffering which is why they’re wrong.
→ More replies (38)•
u/Badestrand 3d ago
El Salvador reduced their crime from crazy high to almost none by harshly imprisoning all their criminals.
•
u/TheRealNooth 3d ago edited 3d ago
You mean the dictatorship? Yeah, I don’t trust those numbers. That’s like saying “North Korea has a god as supreme leader because they said so.” Especially a dictator that labeled himself the “world’s coolest dictator” on social media. He totally wouldn’t lie for optics, would he?
All the literature on the subject shows that making punishments worse doesn’t actually reduce crime.
•
u/Life-Goose-9380 2d ago
El Salvador had a massive organised crime issue. Most El Salvadorans aren’t criminals.
Locking up everyone with organised crime connections will certainly reduce the organised crime issue.
•
u/TECHNOV1K1NG_tv 3d ago
It wasn’t the harsher punishment that reduced crime, it was simply putting the gangs in prison. Bukele used extreme measures, targeting gang leadership and essentially just sweeping tens of thousands of gang members and affiliates off the streets and into prison.
Obviously, due process and all that makes the whole thing controversial, but for the time being it was highly effective in reducing violent crime on a statistical level. Went from 100 homicides per 100,000 back in 2015 (this was a peak, although it consistently averaged in the dozens every year) down to 1.3 per 100,000 in 2025. For context the US averages ~5 per 100,000.
→ More replies (18)•
u/HappyTurtleOwl 3d ago
My friend told me this years ago, about my own country, and he pretty much convinced me, and I believed him. Certainly it’s all propaganda and lies, right?. Years have passed, anecdotes, data, research, for how it can all be biased and twisted, has all come in.
I truly believe, now, with the evidence presented to me, that my friend was wrong, and Redditors are wrong about this. The actions in El Salvador have worked. The numbers aren’t mere propaganda or fabrications. People of all kinds, of all classes, have told me the same story: it worked.
Everything is more expensive, and civil liberties have taken a big hit. But it is the price ES was willing to pay; and it’s worked so far.
At some point the refusal to see what is in front of you actually becomes the optics, the lies, and the conspiracy.
I’ve grown personally a lot in these years, my stance on things is much more measured. Truth is, even back then, there were a lot of reports coming out of ES about the good things happening, and I accepted the Reddit-like advice and assumption of my friend that it was all propaganda and lies. Ironically, that turned out to be untrue.
I’m both glad I took an overly-cautious approach to the issue, but also a bit ashamed I wasn’t willing to meet with the truth sooner than I should have.
ES has a complicated future ahead of it, economically, and in terms of the political and civil power the state could continue to hold over the people… but the worse version of whatever comes next would still be a heaven to the hell the gangs inflicted on ES. This is something I don’t think people consider with ES specifically. It worked, which at the very least proves it can work, but not with every situation. Could it work in places like the US? I personally doubt it, still, but the truth is that no one can truly know until it is tried. Literature means nothing to that. It probably will never happen, though.
→ More replies (6)•
u/Express-Skin6039 3d ago
Exactly. We see how well that worked with the war on drugs.
•
u/Mental-Huckleberry54 3d ago
The war is over man, drugs won
→ More replies (2)•
u/Victernus 3d ago
Drugs won almost immediately and then ran up the score for years while it's opponent repeatedly shot itself in the foot.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)•
u/TECHNOV1K1NG_tv 2d ago
Our war on drugs was so much different than what they did in El Salvador. The US targeted low and mid level dealers in an attempt to rid the streets of the drugs, but this created supply shortages which made the business more lucrative and strengthened the criminal organizations. El Salvador’s efforts were more of a “war on gangs”, going after MS-13 leadership where the main focus was to get the violence off the streets. While controversial due to lack of due process and humanitarian issues in the prisons, it seems to have been highly effective. I’m not saying we do what El Salvador did by any means, it’s just an interesting case study on what happens when you pull out all the stops to get rid of crime.
•
→ More replies (8)•
u/Badestrand 3d ago
I think it's well established that El Salvador massively reduced their crime rate with their hard panusihments.
The question is rather, if this is transferable, and it's probably not, or at most partly.
Afaik you need swift consequences but you also need to not put people in prison for too long and you need to help them back into a stable life after that.
•
u/ThatZX6RDude 3d ago
Some people just aren’t capable of a stable life. Sometimes ya gotta put the dog down
→ More replies (7)•
u/ITworksGuys 3d ago
you also need to not put people in prison for too long and you need to help them back into a stable life after that.
I totally disagree.
You remove criminals from society. It is their responsibility to rehabilitate themselves.
You an show them how, but it isn't societies responsibility to fix you.
If you can't, then you just get removed completely.
→ More replies (8)•
u/RNGesus_GIM 3d ago
No way! You mean to tell me all we have to do is actually lock up criminals instead of letting them out on bail for the 19th time? Get your "common sense" out of here! No, the solution is much more complicated than that! /s
•
•
u/CarryWisely 3d ago
Meanwhile a felon is in the White House and the entire Epstein client list is having a disco free from consequences.
→ More replies (2)•
u/TimeShiftedJosephus 2d ago
Sounds like a problem that wouldn't exist if he'd actually been locked up
→ More replies (1)•
u/CarryWisely 2d ago edited 2d ago
Usually, when people talk about crime and swift/harsh consequences they are talking & thinking about a specific socio-economic demographic.
The wealthier the accused person is and the closer they are to being considered white, there is generally less of an
apparitionappetite for punishment or accountability.Edited for spelling.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (11)•
u/happy_bluebird 3d ago
it's not fixing the root cause. Fear is not the solution
•
u/GenericTR 2d ago
The fear of being locked up for joining a criminal organization (don't get gang tats) is a lot more mild than the fear of cartels murdering your entire family, and displaying your mutilated corpses hanging from a bridge.
America doesn't need a hard reset yet, but ES did need one. 100 murders per 100,000 in a single year. That's horrific. It's war.
→ More replies (11)•
u/Jack071 3d ago
Its a short term solution to make it safe to the non criminal members of society
You can focus on long term politics and reforms AFTER the dangerous criminals are locked in a cell
→ More replies (1)•
u/JonathanWPG 3d ago
They just turned the police into criminals that brutalized the citizenry.
Thats not a reduction of crime.
It's a reclassification of it.
•
•
→ More replies (24)•
u/PhysicsCentrism 3d ago
They also broke a lot of rights of innocent people to do that
→ More replies (1)
•
u/Then_Bar8757 3d ago
Intact families lessens crime.
→ More replies (21)•
u/ilikebulls 2d ago
I’m sure you (and I) will get downvoted for this, but this is correct. In America, a 2 parent household is the greatest indicator for income, higher education, etc. it’s why Asian Americans have by far the highest income of any race - they have by far the highest rate of 2 parent households.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/PNWduder 3d ago
When everyone does better, everyone does better.
•
u/cavalier2015 3d ago
A rising tide raises all ships
→ More replies (8)•
u/Chadlerk 3d ago
I had a boss tell me this once... Then they held my head under water until I got off the shio.
→ More replies (35)•
•
u/Prior-Habit-6523 3d ago
Those things should happen, regardless of violence or not.
→ More replies (5)
•
u/bmo313 3d ago
"The fact is that the greatest crimes are caused by excess and not by necessity." -- Aristotle.
•
u/Electrical-Heat8960 3d ago
It’s not the greatest crimes this would stop.
Ocean’s 11 would still exist (in theory)
But phone theft. Parcel theft, muggings; they would all drop.
This is a documented fact. It’s well known that this works. It’s just the optics aren’t good for politicians and when they want to make cuts cutting support for ex criminals is an easy choice.
→ More replies (7)•
u/FourPlayInTheBay 2d ago
Tell me you don't know any violent criminals without telling
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (7)•
u/Content_Candidate_42 3d ago edited 3d ago
Aristotle also believed birds spent the winter hibernating at the bottom of lakes, and that women had fewer teeth than men.
•
u/Itzlickinlizards 3d ago
I bet you’d believe some dumb shit too if you were alive 2300 years ago, but would you ever come up with a banger quote like that?
•
u/be_my_squirrel 3d ago
Sure, Nickelback sucks, but I bet you’ve never gone platinum <struts off into the sunset>
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)•
→ More replies (13)•
•
u/mars-jupiter 2d ago
Works for some crime, but socioeconomic status is clearly only the reason for a small amount of crime because there are a lot of poor people who have never committed a crime in their life. The socioeconomic status is either one factor among many or not a factor at all depending on the crime and individual.
→ More replies (8)•
u/marmaviscount 2d ago
It's a very complex issue involving many things, making a socially positive human is like getting a car running - taking out the spark plug will stop it ruining but that doesn't mean that fuel, air pump, etc aren't needed.
Economics isn't the only important factor but it's absolutely one of them.
•
•
u/Moral-Relativity 2d ago edited 2d ago
This post having thousands of comments shows that Redditors disagree wildly about how to handle crime.
It seems common sense to me to compare countries with a perceived crime problem (despite say particular crime stats going down) with countries that don’t have such problems, and see the key differences.
US vs China for example. Huge wealth disparity and extreme poverty obviously exist in both countries, but diverse vs homogeneous culture, independent decentralized common law (court ruling establishes precedence) vs centralized courts (reliance on written code over prior rulings) subordinate to the government, often antagonistic view of police vs paternalistic perception (due to propaganda or not), etc.
•
u/Bitter_Plastic2362 3d ago
Reduce poverty, instability and desperation and you’ll likely reduce a meaningful amount of crime. But you’ll never eliminate crime because human behavior has causes beyond economics.
→ More replies (3)•
•
3d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (7)•
u/ExtraCheezyBagel 3d ago
Certainty of punishment is the deterring factor, not severity. This has been studied extensively.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/Jag4342 2d ago
That statement is the classic social-democratic/socialist prescription. Expanding the state’s role in housing, healthcare, wages, childcare, and education has never eliminated crime or resource conflict; it redistributes the conflict into politics, taxation, and regulation. Politicians sell the benefits; the costs in liberty, fiscal sustainability, and unintended consequences appear later. Treating material provision by government as the primary solution to violence ignores culture, family structure, deterrence, and human nature and historically tends to enlarge the very power that can then be used against the people it claims to help.
→ More replies (5)
•
u/MetalGhost99 3d ago
You lesson crime by starting with the heart of the person. People covet what other people have. Even rich people have that problem.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/JutzRealTalk 2d ago
I wonder why that hasn't work in Venezuela and Cuba.
→ More replies (13)•
u/NorthBase710 2d ago
It worked in European countries, Canada. Australia and New Zealand
But sure lets ignore that.
→ More replies (7)
•
u/unofficially_Busc 3d ago
What a world we live in where a statement like this can be considered by some to be contraversial.
•
•
•
•
•
u/xGenocidest 3d ago
People doing flash robs or most of the people shoplifting arent doing it because they're poor. They just want free shit and nobody is stopping them from doing it.
Rich people will still steal if theres no consequences.
•
u/Slice-Vast 3d ago
Rich people break the law all the time because there's no consequences for them. We know this.
→ More replies (8)•
u/SavouryRain 3d ago
They aren't saying no consequences. They're saying that money spent on things like housing and healthcare take the desperation crimes away.
Yes, there will always be assholes stealing shit. The goal is to limit it.
→ More replies (9)•
u/missingpeace01 3d ago
Those rich shoplifters are a tiny minority of robbers and shoplifters lol. Wdym?
•
u/Yop_BombNA 3d ago
I dunno man the guy I saw with 1 shoe running out of tescos with vodka the other day I’m pretty sure did it cause he’s poor and couldn’t afford the alchohol hes addicted to.
→ More replies (27)→ More replies (17)•
u/Jalapenoplanter 3d ago
You want teenagers to not do dumb crimes? Give them stuff to do.
This is a fixable problem
→ More replies (14)
•
•
u/dozerdeep 3d ago
You lessen crime by having a heathy family. Society needs to start there.
→ More replies (7)
•
u/SecretRecipe 3d ago
crime is already near record lows. If you want to lower it further its time to reopen the asylums.
→ More replies (2)
•
•
u/Lowiie 1d ago
When you import poverty from the third world do you have to fix their poverty aswell? Or just your citizens? How much of the world population are you responsible for eliminating poverty for? & how much can you eliminate poverty from people in free countries where people can make their own choices, which are sometimes bad with gambling/drugs etc
Theres variables, reddit doesnt like variables
→ More replies (1)
•
•
u/damac_phone 2d ago
Poverty is not the cause of crime. Newfoundland is a very poor area but has a very low rate of crime. Inequality and a lack of cohesion causes crime
→ More replies (3)
•
u/Distwalker 3d ago
Crime as been steadily falling since the 1980s. Did we have universal healthcare, public housing, strong unions, high wages, universal childcare and free college.
•
u/Chadlerk 3d ago
A lot of things can be contributors. Freakonomics has a bit about the legalization of abortion in 1973. The kids that never were, would have been about 18, in 1990. Those kids typically would've been poor, undereducated, or neglected as they were unwanted or maybe just not able to afford them.
1990 is the time crime starts to fall. They're not saying this is direct causation, but simply that there are a lot of contributors to statistics that might be unseen.
→ More replies (1)•
u/jjack339 3d ago
Surveillance camera tech. could abortion has an impact. Sure.
But discarding the fact the mid 90s is when CCTV tech got to the point where its use was widespread.
Now people have cameras at their homes.
Perps now know they have a much higher chance of getting ID'd. In the 70s you could drive one town over, hold up a liquor store, and as long as you could clear the area before the cops arrived you could expect to get away.
Now there is a very high probability you will get ID'd by some camera at some angle no matter how slick you try to be.
•
•
u/Jayrollinsart1 3d ago
My favorite theory about that is that lead in products artificially rose violent crime and taking lead out of everything brought it back down
→ More replies (19)•
u/for_fun_88 3d ago
The thing is that something like crime is complex because there are so many factors. And it’s an example of why I hate partisan politics because neither side is right on everything.
If you had more safety nets and higher wages for lower and middle class groups, it’d absolutely reduce crime. But lots of things can also reduce crime. Enacting harsh penalties on criminals as a deterrent and to keep criminals locked up given recidivism reduces crime too. So does allowing gun ownership for citizens who take safety classes and don’t have a record. Social programs to help with mentorship of troubled youths and more support for mental health would also reduce crime. Hardly a one side is always right and the other wrong issue
•
u/deedee25252 3d ago
Yes but how will the military recruit people if they aren't desperate? Or get free labor if the prisons aren't full?
→ More replies (4)
•
u/herodotus69 3d ago
This assumes that crime is driven by lack of resources. I see no evidence of this. Rich people commit crimes. So do middle income and poor people. Poor people are upright citizens who never commit a crime. Same with rich and middle income people. Crime is a choice to do harm to others. Resources have nothing to do with it.
→ More replies (11)•
u/AbstractReason 3d ago
Really, so you’ve never visited a prosperous neighborhood or town and noticed that it was safer and cleaner with less vandalism and violent crime? There’s an astounding amount of research and meta analysis that socioeconomic conditions are directly correlated to crime rates.
→ More replies (3)
•
•
•
u/kzwix 3d ago
That's entirely true. You lessen crime. You won't remove it altogether, there will still be homicides, rapes, etc.
But you'll remove a lot of crime due to poverty, despair, and the like. Hence, the police will need less money and people, and will still be able to focus on the remaining crime. Plus, the population will be generally happier.
•
•
•
•
u/Orgy_nizer 3d ago
I mean... Yeah? Obviously? This is equivalent to posting a screenshot of a tweet that says "2+2=4" and asking "thoughts on this?" Like tf you mean "thoughts on this"? Its a basic statement of obvious fact. What "thoughts" even are there to have about it?
•
•
•
u/YoureProbablyAB0t 3d ago
If communities work together then it's harder for people to take advantage of people.
And people who take advantage of others can't have that.
•
•
•
u/KeyCondition5104 3d ago
If this was true, every developing country like China and Korea should've had equitable rates of violent crime when they were some of the poorest countries in the last century. Korea was ranked in the bottom 3 poorest countries in the world in the 1960s. They should've been more violent than American crime. Also, when America was poorer in the 1800s, there should've been exponential crime.
•
•
•
•
•
•
u/Qcconfidential 2d ago
It’s great that this says “lessen” you will never eliminate crime, but we can engineer a society where crime is very rare.
•
•
u/Hefty-Revenue5547 2d ago
But but but then how will the wealthy continue to gain more wealth for their growing families if there isn’t an uninformed populace to exploit :(
Won’t you think about the kids! :/
•
u/Fat-Fuk69 2d ago
Sounds like common sense to me. Americans are too fat and lazy these days to really care though. I'm surprised people can still read over here.
•
•
u/Notsid201 2d ago
I liked the use of the word lessen. Cause you will never eliminate crime, just curb the ones committed out of desperation and hopelessness. You can't stop crazy, greedy, or evil from doing what they do. But you can keep people out of the desperation zone that breeds the "bread thief" mentality.
•
u/BillyBobby_Brown 3d ago
Thoughts on what? This isn't anything new. The people in charge simply don't want this to happen.
→ More replies (39)•
u/Standard_Emphasis382 3d ago
It’s harder to get you to work a job paying $7.25 an hour if death, humiliation, and pain weren’t on the other side. That’s not great for shareholder value.
•
u/AgentKenji8 3d ago
This. Our current economic system prioritises by letting wealth accumulate at the top while the rest either get scraps or die.
→ More replies (2)•
u/Standard_Emphasis382 3d ago
And not because you are more talented or work harder. Its simply because you had capital. If you already have money in this system the deck is Stacked in your favor. If you are broke, good luck.
•
u/AgentKenji8 3d ago edited 3d ago
Something the "pull yourself by your bootstraps" crowd tend to forget. It doesn't matter how competent you are. If you haven't got the resources, contacts and luck. You'll just be one of the masses.
•
u/wterrt 3d ago
Something the "pull yourself by your bootstraps" crowd tend to forget. It doesn't matter how competent you are. If you haven't got the resources, contacts and luck. You'll just be one of the masses.
I mean....at least they're unintentionally using that term correctly: doing something impossible.
•
u/RentIsThePoint 2d ago
It's almost like the people who defend cops by saying "It's one bad apple" without ever finishing the quote. "One bad apple spoils the bushel". Yes. The whole institution is corrupt because of their protection of the bad apples. Thanks for agreeing with me.
•
u/BetSquare7190 3d ago edited 3d ago
Partly true, but you also need a functional and well trained police force, because many people simply have an antisocial personality disorder (in the DSM-5 sense), regardless of their material conditions.
→ More replies (4)
•
u/GuitarsAndFitness 3d ago
This is the type of idealistic thinking that ends up destroying society. Crime and poverty are correlated, not causated. You can never totally eliminate crime without necessarily excluding certain demographics of people.
People have an overly simplistic view, which basically amounts to “I don’t understand why people commit crime, because I would never commit crime. Therefore, there must be some external factor driving people to commit crime! I’ll just eliminate this factor (in this case, poverty), and crime will disappear!”
Obviously this is not the case. There are many factors that are relevant to inducing crime, not least of which is personal choice and a lack of accountability. Culture (arguably the biggest), mental health, IQ, worldview, weak penalties/enforcement, and many others all contribute to crime.
The most immediate and effective way to deal with crime is to have clear policies, steep penalties, and strict enforcement. There are many ways to help treat the underlying issues, which can and should be pursued, without compromising on the laws and their enforcement.
•
u/isthisonetaken13 3d ago
It says lessen crime, not eliminate it. And it isn't idealistic thinking to say that eliminating (or even just reducing) poverty would lessen crime.
•
u/EatBootyLoveLife 3d ago
did we just skip over the whole “LESSEN crime” and assume they meant eliminate?
•
u/corporaterebel 3d ago
Lessen by how much?
And "poverty" isn't defined: Relative? Absolute?
80% of the worlds population is poor, very poor compared to the Western World.
One cannot solve relative poverty. Somebody will always have more or less.
And nobody seems to want to define absolute poverty... because that can be solved.
If the "lessen" isn't a massive percentage, then it is unlikely to be worth it at all.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (29)•
u/Jalapenoplanter 3d ago
What demographics are you talking about?
If you decrease poverty, decrease inequality, you decrease crime
→ More replies (10)
•
•
u/thrwawycauseimadick 2d ago
Explain this to the Amish, Mennonites and pretty much every non violent communities that do not have any of these handouts. This is commie bullshit propaganda.
→ More replies (1)
•
•
u/tearsofaclown0327 2d ago
My thoughts are… this person thinks politics will solve the problem.
The world is run by narcissists of all different flavors and always has been.
If we all followed the golden rule, the world would be great. That’ll never happen and this place will remain a prison.
IMO Jesus is the way, but also organized religion is a scam.
•
u/CopperKnight77 2d ago
If the savage animals of O-Block just had stronger unions or free college then half of Chicago wouldn’t be a war zone.
Definitely not a cultural problem. Clearly a “haven’t spent enough taxpayer money yet” problem.
•
u/GryphyGirl 3d ago
It's factually true. So many studies have proven this. It's beyond debate.
Of course this doesn't take the greedy rich people's crimes out of the equation, still have to deal with them. But that's dealt with by actually recognizing their crimes as crimes and actually punishing them for them with more than a slap on the writ.
→ More replies (1)•
•
•
•
u/Savings_Studio_5678 3d ago
You eliminate poverty by increasing productivity not enforcing a nanny state
•
u/Tough_Shake9821 3d ago
It’s always funny when the people screaming about the government stripping rights, also want the government to have complete power to hand out “basic needs”
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (1)•
u/DarkriseEQOA 3d ago
Correct. Only capitalism and free markets can create wealth. And wealth is what solves problems in society. Unfortunately most people think the solution is just to steal from productive people. Very sad.
→ More replies (35)
•
u/Pretend-Studio6583 3d ago
What do you mean thoughts on this? It’s just objective truth. If people had an overall more healthy happy life there would be no reason really to commit crimes.
•
u/SnooHabits3911 3d ago
It sounds great but you’ll still have crime and violence. You’ll never get rid of humans capacity to commit evil acts
•
u/Tatchkoma 3d ago
Did that person say "Eliminate crime by eliminating poverty?"
Or did they say "LESSEN crime by eliminating poverty?"
→ More replies (4)•
u/ratbastid 3d ago
Right? Why is it always, "Well that would only work 90%, so obviously we shouldn't try it."
→ More replies (26)•
u/WittyFix6553 3d ago
It would eliminate the vast amount of crime and violence.
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
→ More replies (4)•
u/Used-Baby1199 3d ago
It would eliminate crime motivated by economic hardship. It might decrease domestic violence and maybe drug addiction, but those stats would take about a generation to start showing evidence. It would a cool social experiment if we could commit 30 year to it and then evaluate the results
•
u/ul2006kevinb 3d ago
We already have. Most of Western Europe has significant social welfare programs which have significantly reduced their poverty. As a result they have some of the lowest crime rates in the world.
•
•
•
u/boatloadoffunk 3d ago
Yep, that's the gist of it.
Source: I have a bachelor's of science in criminology.
•
u/TheReturnofPanda 3d ago
We have all the necessary resources. People are at each other's throats for bullshit material items like needos, pokemon cards, and la bubus. It's actually so embarrassing.
→ More replies (1)•
u/KaiahAurora 3d ago
Research keeps on showing that countries with better social safety nets have lower rates of crime. It won't stop all crime, but inequality and poverty make things worse
•
u/Sure-Wish3240 3d ago
Brazil has been plagued by these lies for the last 40 years. We have free Chile care, free health Care, free education and free college. Crime is rampant Ane murder rates are th highest in our history. Why?! Because our populist leader are Allied with criminal organizations and our judges free them 24h after polic arrests them.
You Lesser crime rates by erasing or imprisioning criminals and the people allied with criminals.
→ More replies (13)
•
•
•
u/FeistyTwist5427 3d ago
I can’t get behind this at all. I have met some lazy ass people blaming all the their problems on everything around them but they don’t work, make poor choices, blame others. You only get what you put in. Don’t get me mixed up. I want these things to happen, but people will still want more and still be mad somebody else has what they don’t.
→ More replies (3)
•
u/mustangman6579 3d ago
Do people actually fall for this? Don't get me wrong. Its a good start. But its not why crime exists.
•
u/Dakotasan 3d ago
Delusional and naïve. Not every criminal is a desperate little charity case just trying to survive. Some people really are selfish, greedy, violent assholes and they need to be punished when they hurt others. This whole idea that we need more social workers and not police is absolute narcissistic bullshit.
→ More replies (3)•
•
u/Tsunamiis 3d ago
It’s been studied crime reduces when basic needs are met. Greed will always override this ideal but overall crime is reduced
→ More replies (2)
•
u/Ok_Spread_8650 3d ago
Maybe some truth but crime is crime. Criminals don’t need universal healthcare or day care or whatever else. They need drugs and free money and the high of committing crimes.
→ More replies (12)
•
•
•
•
u/hdorsettcase 3d ago
There's a lot of people who haven't fought over material resources and think it's entertaining when other people do.
•
u/Great-Gas-6631 3d ago
Just facts, i mean "crime" will never go away, but all of these things drastically reduces it.
•
u/HodlMyBananaLongTime 3d ago
yes, but they know keeping us desperate is more profitable in more than the obvious of ways
•
•
•
•
u/Ok-Mathematician8461 3d ago
Yeah - this shit is self evident. Pretty well every country has worked this out except for some notable exceptions.
•
u/DE4DM4NSH4ND 3d ago
Thoughts on the truth? I would say it's truthy meter was around 96%. Obviously that won't eliminate all crime but crime would plummet, also i would add to try and treat addicts first for non violent crimes.
•
u/theheckyouwill 3d ago
100%, if you want to solve the whole "gun crisis" this is what you do but politicians on both sides of the isles don't want you to actually start critical thinking because it gets in the way of their corrupt lobby money.
•
•
u/LadySamuss 3d ago
Well, if you want to see how true this is check the crime rates in countries like Finland or Sweden when they have all those things for “free”
•
•
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Hey /u/CurvyChristina, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.
Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!
We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, your post will be queued for approval.. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.