r/shittyaskscience • u/morbiiq • 3d ago
Is beastiality more immoral if the animal is underage?
And does it make a difference to quality of life if you end up in prison?
•
u/13thmurder Professional Sciencer 3d ago
If you fuck a 200 year old tortoise, would that mean the tortoise victimized you?
•
u/wolfpwarrior PhD in Rocket Surgery 3d ago
It depends on the age of the animal in that animals years, like Dog years, cat years, horse years, etc. How you're treated in prison will not change. Not because the prisoners dont care, but because the quality of life already wouldn't be able to get worse.
•
u/TeacupOfSkepticism 3d ago
I'd like to build a petting zoo...
•
•
•
•
•
•
u/Atzkicica Huh? 3d ago
That's why you should stick to dinosaurs no matter how loudly the museum complains.
•
u/snapekillseddard 3d ago
Definitely more immoral because trauma tends to toughen up the meat, and the whole point of slaughtering young animals is for softer meat.
•
•
•
•
u/coolsam254 3d ago
If you paid attention in school then you would know two negatives cancel each other out
•
•
•
•
u/SaltyTemperature 3d ago
Optimally, you get to them before they become embryos. Zygotes, dude. Zygotes.
•
•
•
u/loveddeviant 3d ago
Are you asking this so you can figure out the most ethical way to fuck an animal? 🤨
•
u/Larnievc 3d ago
Surely it’s even more the lesser immorality if it’s dead? Then it’s literally a victimless crime?
•
•
•
•
u/Redfish680 3d ago
Depends on what the animal is wearing I suppose.