I recently finished Neon Genesis Evangelion and watched the film End of Evangelion, and I really liked episodes 25 and 26 of NGE. I know they’re controversial, and I understand a lot of the criticisms: the production constraints, the sudden abandonment of the conspiracy plot, the lack of action. But I’ve been thinking about this psychological dimension to some of the negative reaction. It may sound harsh, but was there a kind of “crabs in a bucket” mentality in some of the negative press?
I don’t mean that everyone who dislikes the ending secretly wants Shinji to suffer. I wonder whether, for viewers who strongly identified with and related to Shinji’s loneliness, self-loathing, fear of rejection and bleak view of himself and other people (with the hedgehog dilemma), his breakthrough at the end might actually feel uncomfortable. For most of the series, Shinji’s worldview is something like: I need other people’s approval to have value; people will eventually hurt or reject me; I don’t really like myself; withdrawing is safer than putting myself out there. Then episode 26 starts dismantling that worldview. Shinji doesn’t suddenly become happy. That’s actually what I loved about it. His conclusion is that there is a chance he can end up loving himself and I found that very satisfying.
It also hit me personally because parts of Shinji’s worldview reminded me of how I thought during my own adolescence. As I’ve gotten older, my view of myself and of other people has changed considerably. So when Shinji realises that the Shinji he hates is not some immutable identity, I found it genuinely moving. The alternate-reality sequence especially drove that home for me: under different circumstances, he could have been very different. Therefore the person he currently believes himself to be is not the only person he is capable of becoming. He can finally take responsibility, do what he actually wants to do. And that made me wonder: when an audience has spent an entire series identifying with a character because that character expresses their own alienation, can it sometimes be uncomfortable when that character begins to outgrow the worldview that created that relatability?
If someone deeply relates to Shinji’s bleakness, perhaps a hopeful conclusion can feel false, unearned or even alienating, because Shinji is starting to move somewhere the viewer isn’t ready or willing to follow him. That’s what I mean by the “crabs in a bucket” idea. Not literally wanting Shinji to remain miserable, but perhaps becoming attached to the version of Shinji whose suffering validates your own worldview, and therefore resisting the moment he begins to change it.
Again, I don’t think this remotely explains all or most of the criticism of episodes 25 and 26. The structural and production criticisms are completely understandable. But I’m curious whether people think this could be one dimension of the ending’s divisive reception.