r/YUROP Iunbroken Feb 11 '25

10,000 IN 8 HOURS BAYBEE

Post image
Upvotes

128 comments sorted by

View all comments

u/SaltyW123 Éire‏‏‎ ‎ Feb 12 '25

Meanwhile

Close the borders! Suspend ALL immigration for 5 years! - Petitions

Been around a month less and has more than double the signatures, not looking great ngl.

Fortunately, neither of these will do anything, but it sums up the sentiment, I think.

u/Archistotle Iunbroken Feb 12 '25

The difference being the EU petition was given up for dead months ago & kept growing organically.

u/SaltyW123 Éire‏‏‎ ‎ Feb 12 '25

That's not a meaningful difference, is it?

It's still going to be filed in the bin, along with all the others

u/Archistotle Iunbroken Feb 12 '25 edited Feb 12 '25

To the question of how it looks? I’d say a petition that was given up on surging back to the top of the board with no-one promoting it is a pretty meaningful difference, yeah.

None of the others were dismissed out of hand, even under the tories. They went through the procedure of giving them a debate, and that’s the win here. Which you know, because in previous comments you were trying to downplay the debate. Now you’re saying it won’t even get that far? Based on what? And which is it?

u/SaltyW123 Éire‏‏‎ ‎ Feb 12 '25

Again, it's not a parliamentary debate, it's a petitions committee debate, which means literally nothing.

u/Archistotle Iunbroken Feb 12 '25

Ah, so it’s NOT getting filed in the bin. Thanks for clarifying!

It means any MP who wants to talk about it now has an opportunity to without Starmer arranging the debate schedule like the issue doesn’t exist. It means the public gets an opportunity to see how MPs react. It means the pro-European alternatives to Labour get a hearing in front of their target audience.

You can minimise that win if you like, but it IS a win.

u/SaltyW123 Éire‏‏‎ ‎ Feb 12 '25

?

You do realise the whole point of the petitions committee system is to minimise?

It gives the public a way to provide input in a way that will never result in any real change, but still give the public this "we're doing something" mentality, exactly so they don't go do something that would result in real change.

Don't you see that?

u/Archistotle Iunbroken Feb 12 '25

I see that the reasons to dismiss the win is less important to you than the desire to dismiss it, judging by how quickly we flit between justifications.

I see more relevance in that then the venue for the debate.

u/SaltyW123 Éire‏‏‎ ‎ Feb 12 '25

My point is it won't be debated meaningfully.

It'll be the equivalent of our debate here, meaningless.

u/Archistotle Iunbroken Feb 12 '25

But it’ll happen. And I’ve already gone over what that means.

u/SaltyW123 Éire‏‏‎ ‎ Feb 12 '25

It gives the public a way to provide input in a way that will never result in any real change, but still give the public this "we're doing something" mentality, exactly so they don't go do something that would result in real change.

You've really fallen for it, hook, line and sinker, system working as intended.

u/Archistotle Iunbroken Feb 12 '25 edited Feb 12 '25

that will never result in any real change

If you think the point was to get Starmer to change his mind, that any of us had hopes this would immediately reverse Brexit, then you’re arguing past the point.

It’s a forum, in an administration that otherwise would’ve pretended the issue doesn’t exist & made sure other MPs who have something to say don’t say it.

Other things need to happen, true. And they will. And this contributes to that, because it’s a win, however hard you have to dig to satisfy a desire to doubt.

→ More replies (0)