this post is a meme comparing a family annihilator to a woman who was having severe mental issues. It's framing a family annihilator as someone who was in psychosis when that's not even remotely what happened with the guy.
It doesn't matter why or how when children were killed by their own parents.
Our little chain here perfectly exposes why this gets such discussion though
Many folks (myself included) don't care if temporary, lingering, or permanent insanity is a factor, a parent strangled their children, lock them up and throw away the key.
So if someone drugs you against your will causing psychosis and you kill a couple people you hope that the person, you hope you will be locked away for life despite you being in psychosis and not by choice?
And that's where your argument falls down, because I'm pretty sure you'll say that you think you deserve leniency and to be treated fairly... but she shouldn't right, because it's just that simple.
It's why people who accidentally kill people without any intention to do so get sometimes release for free, sometimes a negligence charge, depending on the situation.
What about a mother who passes out drunk at home and their toddler gets outside and runs into a run and gets run over, what if the mother passes out due to a medical condition and the same thing happens, should the consequences be identical, should we ignore the reason and context of something happening? Should we ignore context for you but not for other people, or should we have a system that tries to be fair and not one that decides we must smite everyone for everything with no context or deviation because somehow that's justice?
I've been on drugs, you don't randomly kill folks because of a bad trip, but let's entertain your theoretical thing that only happens in people's heads
Absolutely yes, I would rather be executed, but yes
so, you're intentionally dumb and going to take a stand for no reason against common logic.
But you've also decided all drugs automatically mean you become psychotic and have a psychotic break, which I never said, never claimed and absolutely no one on earth believes that.
Funny how you had to make up a nonsense situation to justify it.
The commonly used hard drugs are mostly used because... they are fun, and have a low chance of serious side effects, if they common caused you to act like a psycho, or black out and act like a different person here's a hint, people wouldn't take them recreationally.
When people date rape someone, they don't give them an lsd, or a vicodin, they give them a drug that stops them being able to form memories. There are drugs that can absolutely potentially cause you to fall into psychosis.
Also people have had their drinks spiked with things such that they didn't realise they were drunk or high and then drove drunk/high and caused an accident.
99% of the world concedes that if someone deliberately and against your will causes you to enter an altered state of mind then they are primarily responsible for your actions, not the person they drugged. But sure, make a stand so you don't lose an argument, you sound absolutely rational in doing so.
Scientists, psychologists, doctors, lawyers and educated people don't agree with your feelings and make laws based on primarily facts for a reason.
•
u/Most-Round-4132 15h ago
No1 defends family annihilation, that's why this case gets so much traction