r/SipsTea 15h ago

Wait a damn minute! So what’s taking so long?

Post image
Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/Major747 15h ago

With all due respect, neither do you

u/Useful_Translator536 15h ago

I know she’s a murderer of 3 children that’s a fact. You pretend to know what’s in her head.

u/Time_Screen_9399 15h ago

How can you know it's murder without knowing what's in her head? Innocent until proven guilty. And murder is all about intention.

u/Useful_Translator536 15h ago

Are you dense. She said she killed her children. She tried to killer herself in guilt.

u/seitung 15h ago

How do you know her motivation for suicide was guilt? Are you the one person who knows what’s in her head?

u/Useful_Translator536 15h ago

Please explain to me the possibility’s. She murdered her children when tried to jump to her death. It’s seems pretty obvious to me.

u/seitung 15h ago

If that’s the only possibility you can see then you definitely aren’t familiar with the trial.

u/Useful_Translator536 14h ago

I’m willing to hear your views and try to understand them.

u/Time_Screen_9399 11h ago

Basic legal lesson for ya.

There’s a basic distinction between an act and a legal verdict:

  • Killing is an action (actus reus).
  • Murder is a legal classification requiring specific intent (mens rea).

If someone is legally insane at the time of the offense, the verdict is Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI)—meaning they killed, but are legally not a murderer. Confessing to the action doesn't settle the charge; intent and mental state do.

u/Useful_Translator536 11h ago

Do you speak Latin? I didn’t see a Latin word for NGRI?

u/Time_Screen_9399 11h ago

Have a nice day. I presented an opportunity for you to learn, but seems you just want to argue. Good luck .

u/FlatSherbert9254 10h ago

Oh, no baby, no. This isn’t the look.