r/Sikh • u/Loud_Arachnid3245 • 1d ago
Question How can we interpret Waheguru to be personal (in sense of caring our personal needs) when Gurbani says otherwise?
ਗਉੜੀਮਹਲਾ੫॥
Gauree, Fifth Mehla:
ਮੀਤੁਕਰੈਸੋਈਹਮਮਾਨਾ॥
Whatever my Friend does, I accept.
ਮੀਤਕੇਕਰਤਬਕੁਸਲਸਮਾਨਾ॥੧॥
My Friend's actions are pleasing to me. ||1||
ਏਕਾਟੇਕਮੇਰੈਮਨਿਚੀਤ॥
Within my conscious mind, the One Lord is my only Support.
ਜਿਸੁਕਿਛੁਕਰਣਾਸੁਹਮਰਾਮੀਤ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ॥
One who does this is my Friend. ||1||Pause||
ਮੀਤੁਹਮਾਰਾਵੇਪਰਵਾਹਾ॥
My Friend is Carefree.
ਗੁਰਕਿਰਪਾਤੇਮੋਹਿਅਸਨਾਹਾ॥੨॥
By Guru's Grace, I give my love to Him. ||2||
ਮੀਤੁਹਮਾਰਾਅੰਤਰਜਾਮੀ॥
My Friend is the Inner-knower, the Searcher of hearts.
ਸਮਰਥਪੁਰਖੁਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁਸੁਆਮੀ॥੩॥
He is the All-powerful Being, the Supreme Lord and Master. ||3||
ਹਮਦਾਸੇਤੁਮਠਾਕੁਰਮੇਰੇ॥
I am Your servant; You are my Lord and Master.
ਮਾਨੁਮਹਤੁਨਾਨਕਪ੍ਰਭੁਤੇਰੇ॥੪॥੪੦॥੧੦੯॥
Nanak: my honor and glory are Yours, God. ||4||40||109||
In the entire Shabad, there is a deference and trust in Waheguru, but no claim that what I want is what will occur.
Not sure if my words are right (ie personal). But my point is that there is a recognition that Waheguru is carefree and acceptance of whatever Waheguru does.
Not only is this a reasonable thing that can be understood and logical thing that makes sense as one understands the world. Seems like so much of Kathaa ignores this platform (interacting with world based on reality) when discussing nature of Waheguru and what Sikhi means.