genuine question: when i read the five khands in Japji Sahib, they seem to describe stages of spiritual development, changes in consciousness, understanding, conduct, and relationship with the Divine; rather than destinations or separate supernatural places.
the passage that stands out the most to me is:
ਤਿਥੈ ਘੜੀਐ ਸੁਰਤਿ ਮਤਿ ਮਨਿ ਬੁਧਿ ॥
in Saram Khand, consciousness, intellect, understanding, and the mind are being shaped. that sounds like inward transformation.
Pauri 38 then uses a goldsmith’s workshop to describe spiritual refinement through patience, understanding, and love.
if that imagery is metaphorical, why not read the khands similarly as stages through which realization unfolds? (Ang 8)
Guru Arjan Sahib also says:
ਹਸੰਦਿਆ ਖੇਲੰਦਿਆ ਪੈਨੰਦਿਆ ਖਾਵੰਦਿਆ ਵਿਚੇ ਹੋਵੈ ਮੁਕਤਿ ॥੨॥
liberation occurs while laughing, playing, dressing, and eating. this suggests that realization can unfold within ordinary life rather than by reaching another place. (Ang 522)
Bhagat Kabir says:
ਕਵਨੁ ਨਰਕੁ ਕਿਆ ਸੁਰਗੁ ਬਿਚਾਰਾ ਸੰਤਨ ਦੋਊ ਰਾਦੇ ॥
the saints reject both heaven and hell. while this does not necessarily deny their existence, it shifts attention away from supernatural destinations and toward lived realization. (Ang 969)
i recognize that Sach Khand includes cosmic language about worlds and creation. still, could that describe the expanded vision of awakened awareness rather than a separate location?
If Dharam Khand emphasizes moral order, Gian Khand expands understanding, and Saram Khand reshapes consciousness, why assume these are realms rather than successive transformations in how reality is known and lived? what is the point of living if all of this would happen after death?
are there teekas, scholars, or passages that support either interpretation? if you understand the khands as spiritual realms what specifically in Gurbani makes that reading more convincing than stages of realization-which imo is the “goal” of sikhi?