r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 11d ago

Meme needing explanation Whyyyy peter?

Post image
Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/Triqueon 11d ago

Yes, which is why the American Spaceports are in southern states, and the ESA launches from French Guiana.

u/Satyr121 11d ago

So a mountain near the equator would be best right? Because the further away from the center you are the faster you rotate?

u/HenMeeNooMai 11d ago

Earth surface is relatively flat as fuck. It would not make that much of a difference even if we cut out the cost of transport and construction.

Everest is 8.8km compared to Earth's atmosphere of 10000km

u/Noughmad 10d ago

The atmosphere is 100km, but it's not equally thick everywhere. At the top of Everest, the air density (and pressure) is only one third of the sea-level. Because pressure is directly related to the weight of the air column above you, this means that a rocket launching from Everest only needs to go through one third of the air that a rocket launching from sea level would. Less air to go through, less energy lost to air resistance, less fuel consumed.

Further, because the air is less dense, the dynamic pressure acting on the rocket would be much lower, which means the rocket doesn't have to be as strong to withstand it, so it can be even lighter, resulting in more fuel savings.

However, even with taking all this into account, it's nowhere near worth it.