What movie reference am I missing

[u/Key-Spread-7513]

[u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox → u/[deleted]]

yea but in the movie it was true false did you consider that

[u/willis81808 → u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox]

Even then it isn’t true to say it is harder to get 0% than it is to get 100%

[u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox → u/willis81808]

yea but OP's picture is multiple choice, what about that

[u/willis81808 → u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox]

…it is still not true to say that. As was proven in literally this very thread. There is no situation where it is true.

[u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox → u/willis81808]

oh i thought you were pulling ajoke about exactly what i was complaining about which is that the thread went through a conclusion already through 4 replies, then the same exact thread repeats in this very same exact thread, which is ridiculous, just scroll up

i never said 0% is more likely than 100%, i was VERY SPECIFICALLY ARGUING THAT THEY ARE THE SME ODDS AND CALLING EVERYONE ELSE WHO SAID THEY WERE DIFFERENT ODDS AN IDIOT so you and i are on the same page BUDDY, we're FRIENDS IN THIS ARGUMENT, ON THE SAME SIDE

scroll up, read the thread again, then read me recapping the thread within the same thread, and now the thread repeating below that same response LMAO

so anyways in the movie it was true false did you consider that, i want to rehash this A THIRD TIME, 0% AND 100% ARE EQUALLY LIKELY IN TRUE FALSE, SO WHOEVER BROUGHT THAT UP IS WRONG

but what about OP's original post, it was multiple choice, did you consider that, OH WAIT WE ALREADY DID IN THIS SAME EXACT THREAD IF YOU JUST SCROLL UP

lmao

[u/willis81808 → u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox]

That is what was happening here lol chill

[u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox → u/willis81808]

i can't, my brain has been broken beyond repair, i might have a tumor or something