r/NonPoliticalTwitter 2h ago

What??? situationship dropped another banger

Post image
Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

u/qualityvote2 2h ago

Heya u/simwalkedaway! And welcome to r/NonPoliticalTwitter!

For everyone else, do you think OP's post fits this community? Let us know by upvoting this comment!

If it doesn't fit the sub, let us know by downvoting this comment and then replying to it with context for the reviewing moderator.

u/CK2398 2h ago

u/mishellyBeauty 1h ago

Im still trying to figure out what type of personality disorder this “boyfriend” has

u/2DHypercube 54m ago

My armchair diagnosis is 'being 14 years old'

It's terminal

u/Zealousideal-Deer101 2h ago

don't try to make this into smtg smaller than it was

Her boyfriend did something her boyfriend knew was wrong. Doesn't matter if she's your girlfriend

u/simwalkedaway 2h ago

fucking ragebait i stg

u/AusgefalleneHosen 1h ago

Wasn't my boyfriend so I can't be mad

u/Rezenbekk 2h ago

There's a certain level of audacity where you can't help but be impressed, this is definitely close

u/simwalkedaway 2h ago

this technicality also makes little sense because if he is the bf then he owes her loyalty and if she's not the gf she is free.

anyways i refuse to leave the bird app because every single day i am profoundly flabbergasted by the audacity that people have on full display.

u/Zealousideal-Deer101 2h ago

exactly what I am thinking

u/Polkawillneverdie17 2h ago

Anyone who abbreviates "something" as smtg should go to prison.

u/gamageeknerd 1h ago

My zoomer cousin texts like this and he deserves it

u/CreativeNameIKnow 33m ago

exactly, it should be smth instead /hj

u/kimbosliceofcake 5m ago

/hj = end hand job?

u/SirChasm 1h ago

Did he really think that not-his-gf was going to be all, "yea ur right on this technicality, the exclusivity only flows one way in our relationship, which is totally fair and isn't going to do irreparable damage to it. How silly of me to get upset!"

It's like the religious people who think they found a loophole and only following some of their tenets. Like bro, do you honestly think you're going to pull one over on an all-knowing, all-present God?

u/NeonNKnightrider 1h ago

Yes, they do think that it’s going to work.

Because they are stupid and don’t understand that other people might think differently

u/PonytailEnthusiast 57m ago

In my experience people like this don't care about what YOU think, they care about how they know their behaviour is a bad look and they want to look better to other people by saying "I didn't betray OP technically we weren't together".

I had an ex boyfriend, who was UNAMBIGUOUSLY my bf for a year (we straight up verbally established this shit early on, he was my date to my work party etc) try to pull this shit when I ended it because he was a dick. Multiple people were telling me to dump him and his reputation was taking a hit. His solution was to tell me and other people we were never really together and it was a casual thing.

Luckily no one bought it.

u/peter13g 2h ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/PhToGscBRZki5GpvT2
You’re gonna need this girl

u/aggresivepussykeyt 2h ago

The amount of loopholes in this explanation is impressive

u/Legitimate-Agency282 2h ago

I'd broadcast this garbage too.

This is why I just didn't fuck around with "situationships" or "friends with benefits". They're almost always messy, or will end up messy.

I know I'm more conservative on that front than many. I would be pretty "exclusive" if we made it to the 3rd date, and I've had people call me Puritan for that.

u/simwalkedaway 2h ago

For situationships the only 2 people in them are those who are emotionally unavailable and those with low self esteem.

u/babassu_seeds 2h ago

What made you think the woman in the OP thought she was in a situationship or FWB situation? Many people don't know that they're in situationships--

u/Legitimate-Agency282 2h ago edited 12m ago

I'm not attacking this woman, I am supporting her.

I said situationship because the OP of this thread said that.

I then talked about why I am not a fan of them.

Edit: This person blocked me, and I have no idea why lol.

u/babassu_seeds 2h ago

But a situationship is not when someone asks to be someone else's boy/girlfriend--that's wanting to be exclusive, which is what you're championing in your comment

u/Rigmarrr 2h ago

Mental Gymnastics at the Olympic level

u/SnarkyIguana 1h ago

First mistake was getting involved romantically with someone that writes like that

u/Floba_Fett 1h ago

Well if we do want to get technical, then this dumbass has it upside down, if he's her boyfriend then he was supposed to be loyal to her and since she's not his girlfriend then technically she's the one that was supposed to be no strings attached

u/Cat7o0 1h ago

if he's saying "don't make this into something smaller than it was" does that mean she under reacted? she should've made a bigger deal?

u/simwalkedaway 1h ago

he said bigger

u/Cat7o0 1h ago

huh weird. one comment did say that but I also thought that's literally what I read.

well

u/Enough_Option_7814 1h ago

Homie really thought if this at 2am and thought he was phoenix wright

u/Agent-Ulysses 1h ago

Always read the fine print or smth I dunno

u/FullofLovingSpite 38m ago

Her fault for being with someone this stupid.

There are signs when people are dumb. Especially when they are really dumb. Don't ignore them and expect for the person to suddenly be smarter, it doesn't work that way.

Stay away from dumb people and your life is easier.

u/caubelangthang245 1h ago

Bro learn women's tricks of word plays.

u/simwalkedaway 1h ago

gtfo with that pilled BS