r/NonPoliticalTwitter Jul 16 '26

Funny Poor, poor boy

Post image
Upvotes

801 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/Reesewithoutaspoon2 Jul 16 '26

It’s mainly because of my job, I think. I’m a lawyer and a lot of lawyers (including myself) aren’t too keen on picking lawyer jurors. For understandable reasons imo.

u/FireFright8142 Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26

I honestly couldn’t imagine a lawyer EVER wanting another lawyer on the jury lol

u/7thFleetTraveller Jul 16 '26

Though they would be the few people actually qualified for that job^^. It will never not baffle me how in the USA, they just let random people decide on someone's fate, even if they know nothing about the justice system.

u/ArrogantScience Jul 16 '26

Is that not the case in most countries? It is in the UK and I thought that was the norm

u/Kuroashi_no_Sanji Jul 16 '26

Just common law countries (Anglosphere). So USA, UK, Australia, and Canada, with possibly a couple more countries added in. Most other countries don't use juries, or do so only exceptionally.

u/reichrunner Jul 16 '26

I thought the UK used a panel of judges?

u/ThatMusicKid Jul 16 '26

Jury trials were literally invented in the UK during the reign of Henry II 800 years ago

u/reichrunner Jul 16 '26

Doesnt mean they're still done. The UK doesnt exactly have the same structure as 800 years ago

u/Peterd1900 Jul 16 '26

They Literally are still done

People charged with a Indictable offence are tried in crown court with a judge and a jury of 12, the jury decides if they are guilty or not and the judge decides the sentence

People charged with a summary offence are tried in magistrate court. a Magistrate court has a a panel of 3 magistrates they decide whether or not the person is guilty and they decide the sentence. A magistrate is not a judge, they have no legal training and are members of the public like members of a jury would be

u/reichrunner Jul 16 '26

Ahh gotcha, guess I was mixing a few things together. Thanks for the info!

u/Peterd1900 Jul 17 '26

I think people may equate the magistrates to be a panel of judges but they are not. Its just members of the public and only for what aew effectivily misdeaminours

Essentially its a jury of 3 or a jury of 12

The jury of 3 for the low level crimes also decide the sentence whereas the jury of 12 for high level crimes do not

Ok it is possible in some occasions for low level crimes instead of it being 3 magistrates it is a single district judge

u/ThatMusicKid Jul 16 '26

I'm British. They're still done. I live in constant fear of being called up for jury duty and a trial drags on for long enough that I miss my clinical placements and have to remediate

u/Kitthani Jul 16 '26

The UK has Magistrates' Court with a panel of 3 volunteers + a trained legal advisor (or sometimes 1 paid judge), which might be what you're thinking of? That's used for (generally) less serious crimes as magistrates can't sentence someone to more than 12 months in prison (though there's talk about changing that atm), so serious crimes are tried in the Crown Court which does have juries.