I came across this reddit post.
Leaked Chinese state research papers literally outline how they use AI and Reddit to manipulate Gen Z, specifically
I did not dismiss the post. I was naturally curious since some right-wingers on reddit claim that all the doomerism is due to Chinese bots. Moreover, I would be interested in what particular grievances that Chinese propaganda would exploit. There are many due to the precarious position of GenZ. It's common sense that people's conditions would improve if you cut military spending and put the savings in social programs. Don't need Chinese propaganda to arrive at that epiphany.
Turns out the article the poster cited is really thin.
https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exclusive-chinese-state-researchers/
Chinese state-linked researchers have published a step-by-step playbook for influencing the American electorate.
Go on...
Customized narratives and sustained psychological pressure can then be used to change decisions. The passage attributes the tactic to foreign militaries, but the PLA publication says understanding the mechanism is important for innovating cognitive-warfare methods.
So what are these "sustained psychological pressure" and "Customized narratives" delivered by Chinese influence operations? I really want to know what these "cognitive-warfare methods" are.
Those operations provide the distribution system. The newly uncovered Chinese studies provide the targeting doctrine.
What is the "targeting doctrine"?
So what would constitute evidence of significance influence from Chinese information operations?
https://www.semafor.com/article/09/02/2026/paid-actors-ai-writing-how-a-new-kind-of-video-business-cashed-in-on-americas-divided-politics
Semafor uncovered a network of "ghost creators" that had been harvesting right-wing viewers for ad revenue. Often, it attacks left-wing politicians such as Zohran Mamdani and Bernie Sanders. It says "Mamdani is SHOCKED when Citi Bank announces move to Florida". (Like a journalist has access Mamdani's reaction. Almost certainly, no video or press release from the politician is cited. There also seems to be limited evidence for the adverbial clause.)
Four months ago, I came across one of these accounts on my own. Omar's Talk Show or Kareem Maize. I was intrigued that this man was able to get hundreds of thousands of views from what is obviously AI-generated scripts. I really thought, initially, that he was an advanced AI model since his tone and gestures were appropriate. (If that were the case, conservative content creators would be threatened.)
https://www.reddit.com/r/isthisAI/comments/1t9tuh5/politics_99_percent_sure_this_is_ai_just_asking/
https://www.reddit.com/r/IsthisAIpolitics/comments/1t9e1nr/999_percent_sure_this_is_ai_just_asking_so_i/
Omar also had a website, now taken down, that portrayed him as an "independent journalist." That seemed impossible due to the volume of his content. This "journalist" probably was inspired by articles about "corporate migration" and "capital flight" from right-wing media, then regurgitated by an AI model.
I would've admired Omar if he saw an opportunity to use AI to make money from credulous right-wing viewers. After all, I despise right-wing content, so having an AI generate scripts for me and read them while I generate a lot of money seems like a nice use of AI. It would prevent me from engaging in the emotional labor of generating a script that appeals to right-wing viewers.
Unfortunately, Omar is hired to make videos for $26 each. He is a part of a larger network as opposed to being an opportunistic entrepreneur. How pathetic! Why do you need AI when gig labor is cheap?
The operation tried to create an anti-Trump personality, but it did not take off. Left-wing AI content doesn't work.
So what motivated me to write this? I suppose I'm just tired of the gaslighting that people's negative political and economic outlook is due to doomerism and Chinese bots. As we can see, there is no evidence for the latter.