So interesting story. I knew a guy years ago who worked for Microsoft. His job was literally looking at all the shit that gets reported as like offensive etc. Not sure exactly what h did but he mentioned having to view some pretty sick shit multiple times and it took a toll on him.
They wanna watch me and even if they wanna sell that shit then I'd make certain that someone is going to pay the iron price.
I didn't have to make them do that.
Kids are perfectly capable of doing dumb shit in the house.
And the problem is already in someone sexualizing half naked kids.
It isn't sexual ... Only the minds of adults are poisoned with the current state of mind ...
Anything labeled 'children' or 'terrorist' sells more rules and laws.
Sure, you don't. Toddlers are especially famous for stripping and running around.
But the person I replied to specifically said "have them...." which generally means telling or coercing them to.
Lots of kids love being naked and I agree it's honestly weird when people are all like OHMYPEARLS about it, but regarding someone who wants to "have" their children be naked on camera so they can claim it's CSAM is essentially admitting that they're sexualizing abusing them in this fantastical situation in their heads. If there's no child sexual abuse, there's no child sexual abuse material.
I totally am with you here.
My kids were a pain to keep dressed at some point.
But also I'm an 70s kid, things were different.
My family took us to saunas and nude beaches, so I've learned the difference at very young age.
Now... I wouldn't let my kids run around, nor do we do saunas, only because of the possible idiots around with their cameras
•
u/think_panther 6d ago
Nah, then they would probably sell the material to a fetish japanese porn site. "For the upkeep of the servers"
And for paying a person to pixelate dicks