r/Askpolitics Jun 13 '26

MEGATHREAD Megathread: Political literature and research methods

Upvotes

This megathread will ONLY deal with suggestions on political literature and research methods suggestions for those interested and seeking advice on what literature and/or research methods to apply/read to stay informed.

All comments not specific to literature or research methods will be deleted.

We mods will no longer accept any stand-alone and repeat questions about which types of literature or advice on how to get/stay informed about politics and will redirect to this megathread. Want recommendations on literature? Post here. Seeking advice on how to stay informed, what type of news media sources to access? Post here. Feel the need to share your research methods and/or literature you recommend? Post here.

Absolutely NO discussion, NO comments from the peanut gallery .. book, title, author + basic context and/ or your research source/method.

Megathread will remain active for the long-term.


r/Askpolitics Apr 06 '26

MOD POST Respect the Flair: Zero Tolerance for Personal Attacks and Political Projection

Upvotes

Following the recent announcement of our new “Advice for Life” flair, it has become necessary to address the behavior we are seeing in the comment sections.

The purpose of this subreddit is to foster the exchange of political ideas and information. The addition of the "Advice for Life" flair was intended to provide a space for practical, real-world applications to navigate a politically charged environment. However, some users have taken this as an invitation to engage in hostile behavior that violates the core principles of this community.

Let this post serve as a final warning regarding the following behaviors:

  1. No Personal Attacks

We have observed an uptick in users attacking the character of others rather than engaging with their arguments. Disagreement is expected; disrespect is not. If you cannot make your point without resorting to insults, name-calling, or condescension, do not comment at all.

  1. Stop the Political Projection

A recurring issue in the recent posts as of late involves users "diagnosing" or projecting motives onto others based on their perceived political leanings.

To be crystal clear: Assuming someone’s moral character based on their flair or party affiliation is a violation of civil discourse. Assigning malicious intent to a question or a piece of advice simply because it doesn't align with your worldview is unacceptable.

  1. Focus on the Content, Not the Poster

The "Advice for Life" flair is for seeking and giving guidance on navigating a politically charged world. It is not a battleground for you to vent your frustrations about the "other side." When a user asks for advice, respond to the query. Do not use it as a springboard to generalize about entire groups of people or to harass the OP.

Moving Forward:

Effective immediately, the moderation team will be taking a stricter approach to these violations:

  1. Temporary bans will be issued for first-time offenders of the "No Personal Attacks" rule.

  2. Permanent bans will be issued for repeat offenders or those who engage in targeted harassment.

  3. Comments that rely on "projection" or bad-faith generalizations will be removed.

We want this to be a place where people of all political stripes can seek understanding and practical help.and most importantly participate in the discourse. We will not allow a toxic minority to ruin that for the rest of the community.

Respectfully,

r/askpolitics Mods


r/Askpolitics 19h ago

Discussion Are there ways to change how we pick leaders without being undemocratic?

Upvotes

The way I see it the way our voting system currently works is that most politicians are chosen based on their ability to campaign. Obviously policy proposals, voting history, money, and other things go into the formula but it does boil down to who convinced the most people to vote for them.

I think problems arise because a lot of American can be swayed by how issues are framed, misinformation, and other tricks candidates are able to use. As a result we don’t necessarily get the person who skills necessarily make them the most qualified to be in the position but instead the person who did the best job selling themselves. There’s also the added level of how campaigning impacts candidates decisions in office. For example when republicans blocked the immigration bill so they’d have something to campaign on or the fact the left never made abortion rights a constitutional amendment so they’d have something to campaign on.

When I’ve tried to think about solutions I get stuck. The one spot I end up going back to is putting some level of competency requirements in before you’re able to vote but that gets messy and dangerous way to fast. The other option I’ve come up with is some type of panel of various experts pick the candidates but then it isn’t really democracy anymore. I know the common answer around this type of thing is campaign finance reform but where I get stuck there is that it’s so vague and I’m not sure how fairly it’d be implemented.

Long story short I’m stuck and would like some help thinking this through. How can we elect leaders based on theirs qualifications to be president as opposed to those who just run a good campaign?


r/Askpolitics 1d ago

Question Has anyone seriously considered a system where we vote on policies and such instead of politicians?

Upvotes

I have been thinking lately about how, for any side, politicians are unreliable to do what they said they were going to do, and basically cannot be held accountable legally, at least in our current system. So I started to wonder, are politicians the ultimate middle men of our country? Like Ticketmaster for tickets rather than buying directly. There might be a better example but that's all I've got at the moment. Why would it be a good or bad idea to vote directly for what we want, rather than for politicians who will hypothetically do it for us? I am very curious about this.


r/Askpolitics 1d ago

Answers from... (see post body for details as to who) trump supporters of reddit, what time perioid to you concider to be the "great" in the phrase "MAGA"?

Upvotes

in the phrase "make America great again" what time perioid do you think is being called great?


r/Askpolitics 1d ago

Question What political viewpoints do you expect to lose out for good in the centuries to come?

Upvotes

Similar to how slavery is virtually unanimously viewed as totally preposterous and intolerable and morally indefensible, and for good reason, do you foresee any positions today that are currently hotly debated "both sides" issues, but in the future will be viewed as totally "one side is right, the other is wrong" like slavery is today?


r/Askpolitics 1d ago

Question Does movement between states depress wages?

Upvotes

I’ve heard a lot of people complain about immigrants from other countries depressing US wages, but when I hear about say people moving from California to Texas, people treat that as a good thing for Texas.

Why don’t people argue that the additional Californians moving to Texas depresses Texas wages and uses Texas’s welfare? Isn’t this even more true than out of country immigration since immigrants from other countries tend to use less welfare than native born Americans?

Also I see that a big argument for why it’s good for states to have people move in is that it increases the tax base, but isn’t that true for like immigrants from Mexico or India since they get taxed too?


r/Askpolitics 2d ago

Question People who think police/prisons should be fully abolished, what do you propose to do with people who remain dangerous?

Upvotes

Say no amount of intervention will stop someone from raping. What would be your proposal to address it, either by stopping it or accepting it is necessary in the system.


r/Askpolitics 3d ago

Question Why does the US talk less about Libya than it does about places like Venezuela, Greenland, Falkland Islands?

Upvotes

Obviously Venezuela, Greenland and Falkland have alot of oil but Libya has way more oil. Why is it talked about less than the others or is it mostly controlled already? Also same goes for places like Brazil (assuming its because brazil is too strong?), and major emphasis on West Africa, which is barely talked about at all. Are they being ignored or are advancements more silent?


r/Askpolitics 4d ago

Question Has Trump actually done anything that has irreversibly damaged the United States of America?

Upvotes

Asking as someone from England who isn't all too invested in US politics. A lot of my American friends, especially my girlfriend who lives over here, do not like Trump and treat him as an incredibly awful figure.


r/Askpolitics 4d ago

Question Would you say the Left is winning or losing the culture war?

Upvotes

By left I mean primarily the progressive/social-justice left rather than the liberal left, although I realize the boundary between the two is fuzzy.

And by culture war, I'm using the wikipedia definition:

"A culture war is a form of cultural conflict (metaphorical war) between different social groups who struggle to politically impose their own ideology upon mainstream society, or upon the other. In political usage, culture war is a metaphor for "hot-button" politics about values and ideologies, realized with intentionally adversarial social narratives meant to provoke political polarization among the mainstream of society over economic matters, such as those of public policy, as well as of consumption. As practical politics, a culture war is about social policy wedge issues that are based on abstract arguments about values, morality, and lifestyle meant to provoke political cleavage in a multicultural society."

Or more concisely: political and social conflict over values, morality, identity, lifestyle, and other culturally divisive issues, particularly when those disagreements become part of wider partisan conflict.

During roughly the early-to-mid 2010s and continuing into the early 2020s, progressive ideas became much more prominent in many parts of Western society. Attitudes and public discussion around identity, race, gender, sexuality, discrimination, and social justice generally experienced a sharp leftward turn, while concepts such as systemic racism, privilege, intersectionality, DEI, and gender identity became much more visible and influential in mainstream institutions (universities, corporations, entertainment media, nonprofit orgs, and government).

Some background on the period I’m referring to:

Woke - Broadening Usage - Wikipedia

[2304.01596v1] The Great Awokening as a Global Phenomenon - Arxiv

I know terms such as “woke” and “Great Awokening” can be controversial, or carry some baggage/be mainly used by critics or conservatives. I would like to note the terms themselves do not originate from a conservative, are used by some sociologists and analysts, and I’m using them here mainly as shorthand for the broader shift in attitudes and institutional practices.

A couple obvious examples of progressive positions becoming more mainstream: support for same-sex marriage (Obama ran *against* gay marriage in 2008), greater visibility and acceptance of trans people and promotion of trans-rights, advances in feminism and anti-racism in university and government boards (some 90%+ of researchers in social sciences identify as liberals/leftist, and the few conservatives express high rates of self-censorship), corporate Pride campaigns, DEI programs, diversity initiatives in hiring and education, and much greater public attention to representation and discrimination.

But in the last several years there has also been a noticeable backlash, and scores of politicians, companies and institutions that previously embraced social justice (the language and publicity, if not necessarily the policies and ideals) have, more or less, moderated or changed their attitude and approach.

So I’m curious how people here interpret the bigger picture. What's happening/changing?

I’d especially be interested in why you think so, and which areas or examples you think best demonstrate the trend.

EDIT: some may be less clear on what I mean by culture war, so here’s how I’m using the term;

The idea of “winning” here is which side is being more effective at propagating and entrenching their views and supporters in mainstream society.

A culture war is, metaphorically, perhaps best represented in the shape of cultural battlegrounds and public discussion; victory is when your supporters and narrative become so overwhelmingly socially and culturally dominant in a particular debate/hot button topic for political discussion that what was previously controversial or considered an extreme/partisan position has now become mainstream;
to question your side’s views becomes itself controversial, because both official institutions and general public opinion now largely support it, and the detractors are no longer respected/are in a sharp minority.

And so broadly, who’s winning the culture war, is essentially which side’s idea occupy more of the mainstream, which side’s proponents are increasing, which ideological party’s positions, beliefs, values and methods are most successful at convincing the moderates or people from other side or the fence-sitting non-political people to agree and share the same values.


r/Askpolitics 4d ago

Question What would be the political advantage or disadvantage of asking a witness whether Obama could serve a third term?

Upvotes

During congressional hearings, Democratic members will sometimes ask a right-leaning witness whether Donald Trump could legally serve a third term.

The witness will often avoid giving a direct answer and respond with something like, “I’d need to know more about the circumstances,” or “I’m not prepared to answer that.”

A follow-up that has always seemed obvious to me would be: “Could Barack Obama serve a third term?”

My thinking is that this would force the witness into one of two positions: either maintain the same ambiguity and imply that Obama might also be eligible for a third term, or answer “no” and explain why the same constitutional rule would not straightforwardly apply to Trump.

But I don’t recall seeing members of Congress use that follow-up.

Rather than asking anyone to speculate about the private motives of a particular senator or representative, I’m curious about the political strategy involved.

Would bringing Obama into the exchange weaken the point they are trying to make? Would it distract from the witness’s unwillingness to answer about Trump? Is there some messaging, or procedural, or rhetorical reason that suggests keeping the question focused solely on Trump is more effective?

I’m interested in how someone experienced with congressional hearings or political communications would think about the strategic tradeoffs here.

(And if this follow-up actually has been used in a hearing, I’d be interested in seeing it.)


r/Askpolitics 4d ago

Answers From The Right What are some of Trump's qualities that you want/don't want to see again in the next Republican candidate/president?

Upvotes

Voting for or supporting a man does not mean you like everything about him. What are some qualities of Trump or anything about him as a person (e.g. his personality) that you like and want to see in the next Republican presidential candidate?

Also, what are some things you dislike about him and wish to not see anymore?


r/Askpolitics 4d ago

Discussion If the union demographic shifts to the Republicans, how should Democrats reorient?

Upvotes

The 2024 election saw significant defections among the blue collar, organized labor demographic - going so far as the President of the Teamsters speaking at the Republican national convention.

If this shift accelerates, the Republican party might poach the lions' share of the union demographic from the Democrats.

If that were to happen, what demographic(s) could Democrats court to fill that gap - and how would that new blood interact with the current base?


r/Askpolitics 4d ago

Question Will there be midterms if...?

Upvotes

An Aussie here, I have no clear understanding of your political system and, truly, I really don't want to have any.

I do know you have your mid term elections coming up, I read about it all over Reddit. I also know that a lot of people are vehemently opposed to the Trump regime as it stands and hoping to get back some form of dignity by voting out the Republicans, am I right in assuming that?

From what I read Trump is not keen on that outcome and I'm sure he isn't going to idly sit by and watch it happen.

Can he manufacture a reason to implement a case for a state of national security, or whatever you guys call it, and cancel the midterms.

Also from what I am reading, some people are using the term Civil War, wouldn't that play right into his hands?


r/Askpolitics 5d ago

Discussion Vote on Amendment freezing the Supreme Court at 9 justices fails to pass

Upvotes

A vote on an Amendment to the Constitution failed to gain advance past the House on a mostly party line vote of 212-206. Only 1 Democratic lawmaker voted for the Amendment. This Amendment required a two-thirds majority to pass The House, and would have required a two-thirds majority in the Senate to become law. Mike Johnson, House Speaker, of Louisiana, suggested that the vote today was meant to make Democratic lawmakers “put their money where their mouth is,” in whether they support the expanding of the Supreme Court or not.

Support of expansion of the High Court is equally split when it comes to Judicial Reform, according to a Marquette University Law School poll in May Poll. The same poll found term limits were more favorably supported.

Opponents of this Amendment classified it as a way to “lock in” the Court’s conservative super majority, and claimed that Trump and Republicans have “corrupted” the Court by denying Merrick Garland a hearing when Antonin Scalia died, creating a vacancy on the Court. Jamie Raskin, D- MD, decried this as “Court packing on Steroids.” Democrats also asked why specifically nine Justices on the Court should be enshrined in law. Mary Gay-Scanlon, D, PA, argued that this amendment would “undermine our system of checks and balances,” be a “grave mistake,” and “permanently tie Congress’ hands.”

Question: What is the best way to “fix” the Supreme Court? Do you support term-limits, and temporarily packing the Court until the current, non-term limited Justices retire? Do you have a better plan? Should the Court be enshrined in Law at 9 Justices?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2026/09/02/republican-bill-enshrining-supreme-court-at-9-justices-fails-to-pass-house/


r/Askpolitics 5d ago

Discussion Do you intend on voting by mail?

Upvotes

A Postal Service whistleblower has claimed that the system the Postal Service intends to use to ensure only registered, legal voters receive mail in ballots is “rushed and sloppy.” The Postal Service contends that “Regardless of political party or perspective, we share a common goal: ensuring that Americans can have confidence that their election mail will be handled securely and delivered reliably.” The Whitehouse explains the software buildout and development is neither “complex nor unique” for the Post Office because it already uses bulk mailing and intelligent mailing barcodes for its customers. “…the federal government is working to ensure safe, transparent, and honest elections,” spokeswoman Lauren Bis said.

So the question I pose is: do you intend to vote by mail? If you do, do you have faith in both the government and the Postal Service to ensure your vote is counted, and your voice is heard? If not, why not?

https://apnews.com/article/midterm-elections-postal-service-mail-voting-7f7cf4fdf2e9cf369ae96f96fbda03f2


r/Askpolitics 5d ago

Advice for Life IDK my political alignment?

Upvotes

I'm a teenager and will be voting this year for the first time, however I've been falling down a rabbit hole of sorts and not knowing where I stand and am wanting to get outside perspectives regarding politics. I've always considered myself a Christian republican or a conservative, AND BEFORE THAT MAKES ANYONE HAVE A VIEW OF ME ID LIKE TO FURTHER MY POINTS!!!! I'm pretty neutral with my standpoints regarding most political arguments, and to me personally my arguments for such are logical, while I think far left and far right are both harmful extremists.

For instance, I personally think abortion is not something I would ever chose to participate in. But at the same time, I don't think that the government should have the option to control whether someone can or cannot get an abortion. Morally I don't think anyone should participate in an abortion past a certain point, but I don't think people are always that moral. So I don't know if I think abortion regulations are good or bad. In terms of being a Christian I think that no one should get one, BUT Jesus gave people the opportunity to follow him OR NOT, and if you don't follow Jesus you don't have to adhere to these standards I've placed on myself.

Another, gun regulations, I think guns are a tool. They're used to hunt - and gather food more ethically than large corporations - but like anything else have led to awful crimes. I think gun regulations are good, but how can these regulations be done in a way that is productive? Getting rid of guns all together seems extremely unproductive.

Finally, I think that immigration needs to have regulations. I come from a legally immigrated family btw. While I don't think things are necessarily handled correctly all the time, I think that immigration laws need to be set in place, for the safety of themselves and citizens. There is a right/moral way to do things and a wrong/immoral way to do things.

I also don't understand how people who are pro-choice are against guns because they don't want the government to control their bodies but I think having a right to bear arms and the ability to own weapons TO AN EXTENT goes hand in hand. Same way I think if you're pro-life and don't believe abortions can be legal, how would you have any right to say abortions are illegal but so are guns?

I'm willing to be persuaded and am going into this with a completely open mindset.

With all that being said. I love my country. I come from an immigrant family and we are blessed to be here. I can see the wrongs in this country, but I can also see how fortunate this country is and I think it's something a lot more people need to be aware of!

I think in theory I would be a liberal but I think modern liberalism isn't what it's meant to look like!

Can you help me to dive deeper on the matter of politics and figuring what side I align with more?


r/Askpolitics 5d ago

Question What do you think of the political prospects of UAW President Shawn Fain?

Upvotes

I know he doesn't have any real name recognition right now, but he certainly has working class credentials and is a pretty good communicator. He is in his late 50s, so he's not super young, but he's not a dinosaur. Maybe he'd make a good VP candidate.

Edit: It looks like Shawn Fain is easily confused with Teamster's President Sean O'Brien. O'Brien was the guy who spoke at the Republican convention. Shawn Fain is the UAW President - totally different people.


r/Askpolitics 6d ago

Answers From the Left If Dems take power in 2026 or 2028 and don't prosecute Trump Admin for crimes, how will this affect your support?

Upvotes

Plenty of ink has been spilled about the failure of the Dems to not prosecute Trump for insurrection after Jan. 6.

Since Trump has entered office, his family and admin, have been accused of repeatedly violating the Constitution and federal law. This includes massive self-dealing, corruption, violations of the fourth amendment, birthright citizenship, etc.

While the ruling of the Supreme Court over presidential immunity and Trump's abilities to pardon his staff, makes prosecuting him, his family, and amdin difficult, many people believe that if we do not at least attempt to bring these people to justice, then we might face even worse consequences in the future.

If Democrats take power in 2026 or 2028 and choose not to prosecute members of the Trump administration for alleged crimes, how will that decision influence your ongoing support for the party?

Sources

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/07/trump-legal-failures-blame-column-00187945

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/22/us/politics/trump-jan-6-merrick-garland.html

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/06/politics/doj-trump-jan-6-riot

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/epic-corruption-plain-sight

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/13/trump-presidency-revenue-wealth

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/fact-sheet/ice-cbp-legal-analysis/


r/Askpolitics 7d ago

Question What is your opinion of Flock cameras?

Upvotes

Flock cameras are getting installed throughout the US, from red states to blue states.

They are supposed to be used as license plate readers to track stolen cars, but there are increasing number of reports of them being misused/abused:

  • South Carolina officer fired for allegedly using Flock cameras to run ex's plate 166 times (source)
  • Police officer arrested after tracking ex-girlfriend on Flock camera system over 2,000 times (source)
  • Florida police officer fired, arrested over alleged misuse of Flock camera database (source)

What is your opinion of them? Is this a left vs right issue? I'd like to hear from people on both left & right.


r/Askpolitics 7d ago

Question Do people that don’t support this war, still support Trump?

Upvotes

Is this a deal breaker since he ran on no more wars? Or are his supporters willingly to disagree with him, but still support him in the end


r/Askpolitics 9d ago

Question What are we going to do about the US-Canadian relationship after this?

Upvotes

Hi everyone! If you’ve been paying attention to the news recently, you might’ve seen the latest jab against Canada that the president has made in response to the new trade war. This renaming of Lake Ontario thing seems to cross a line in terms of open hostility between our governments, and this is just deeply concerning to me. Foreign policy interests me a lot, and seeing our closest and most steadfast ally turn into a punching bag is just appalling to me. How do we move forward? What will happen in the next administration if the coming president is a Dem vs Rep?


r/Askpolitics 9d ago

Discussion How does the deportation of Milo Yiannopoulos reflect current U.S. immigration enforcement priorities and high-profile visa policies?

Thumbnail cbsnews.com
Upvotes

According to recent reporting, far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos has been deported following an arrest by U.S. immigration authorities.

While high-profile deportations often draw significant media attention, they also highlight the interplay between U.S. immigration law, visa status compliance, and executive branch enforcement priorities.

How do high-profile visa overstay or compliance arrests influence broader public perception and enforcement policy within the Department of Homeland Security?

To what extent should political status or public profile play a role .. if any.. in how immigration authorities prioritize visa reviews and removals?

What policy precedents does this set for foreign media figures & commentators operating in the U.S. under non-immigrant visas?


r/Askpolitics 9d ago

Discussion Is the debate about US/Israel relations a Dreyfus affair-style divide?

Upvotes

Is the current pervasive issue where an American politician stands on Israel similar to the political binary that the Dreyfus affair was to France in the late 1800s? The parallels feel really similar, despite the difference in scale of the events. Candidates in state congressional races and local government positions are being grilled on their Israel positions even though it realistically has no bearing on what they'd do in office. No candidate for New York City assembly is going to meaningfully change Israel policy. Candidates seem to have to be either pro or anti Israel with almost zero nuance. What I've also noticed is that a slight pro or slight anti-Israel position from a given politician tends to get lumped in with the people who have very strong positions on the issue. Israel has basically become a purity test on both the left and right extremes, who, for vastly different reasons, both don't really like Israel. In a lot of progressive and far-right circles, the Israel issue is treated like a moral issue. I'm not necessarily saying it is or isn't a moral issue, but it's interesting to see the parallel about how one issue is "the" issue that every candidate, major or minor, left or right, is scrutinized on. During both the arguments over the Dreyfus Affair and current American/Israel relations, Jewish politicians and figures were put in really difficult positions.